Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD vs GLE 350 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

192

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

/

4395

/

1795

/

1562

/

2655

/

430

/

Fuel Economy

16.7

/

48

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

3.0 L - 3.0 L

153 HP - 155 BHP

333 BHP - 429 BHP

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

9-speed automatic & AT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

/

Gasoline

/

155 BHP

/

200

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Electric Curtain - Rear
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Door Reflectors
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • GLE 350

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickGLE 350

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD if you care more about overall equipment; choose GLE 350 if you care more about power.

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.99, while GLE 350 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a wheelbase of 2655, while GLE 350 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while GLE 350 uses No data.