Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GT (AWD) vs Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
210
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4550
4549
1840
1860
1675
1689
2700
2734
506
/
Fuel Economy
14.3
14.9
58
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
2.0 L
151 BHP - 190 BHP
216 BHP
6-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
188 BHP
216 BHP
251
325
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GT (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickLynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GT (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GT (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GT (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2700, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-5 2024 2.5L GT (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive.