Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD vs GLC 200 4Matic Comparison

Car Information

6.8

7.3

Engine / Motor

6

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4745

4656

1890

1890

1687

1639

2870

2873

/

550

Fuel Economy

13.5

7.1

58

66

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Key Spec

3.3 L

2.0

280 BHP - 284 BHP

211 BHP

8-speed Automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.3 L

2.0

Gasoline

Gasoline

280 BHP

211 BHP

450

350

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • GLC 200 4Matic

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickMazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about price; choose GLC 200 4Matic if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mazda | Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

    VS

    Avatr | 11 AWD

    Mazda | Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

    VS

    Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

    Mazda | Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

    VS

    Tank | 500 Signature 3.0T

    Mazda | Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

    VS

    Tank | 500 Prestige 3.0T

    Mazda | Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD

    VS

    Tank | 500 Signature 2.0T HEV

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while GLC 200 4Matic has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2870, while GLC 200 4Matic has a wheelbase of 2873. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLC 200 4Matic, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while GLC 200 4Matic uses Four-Wheel Drive.