Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD vs X5 M50i xDrive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
/
250 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4745
4922 mm
1890
2004 mm
1687
1745 mm
2870
2975 mm
/
645 L
Fuel Economy
13.5
9.5 Km/L
58
83 L
/
9.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
3.3 L
3.0 L - 5.0 L
280 BHP
306 BHP - 530 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
4.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
530 BHP
450
750 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
X5 M50i xDrive
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about price; choose X5 M50i xDrive if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while X5 M50i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2870, while X5 M50i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X5 M50i xDrive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while X5 M50i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive.