Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs Song Plus Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
170
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5075
4775
1969
1890
1716
1680
2930
2765
407
574
/
Flush Door
/
1790
/
19
/
5
Fuel Economy
11.9
14.5
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
LCD
/
Sensatec Leather
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Front and Rear
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
4x Front Sensor, 4x Rear Sensor
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag, Integrated side air curtains
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Seats
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
15.6-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
DIRAC
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Multi- link(5 links)
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
VENTILATED DISC
/
DISC
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
197 BHP - 360 BHP
Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.5T
Gasoline
Hybrid
226 BHP
319 BHP
420
520
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical, Sand and Mud Terrain Mode
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
596
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Song Plus Design
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Song Plus Design if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while Song Plus Design has a fuel consumption of 6.9. Therefore, Song Plus Design is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while Song Plus Design has a wheelbase of 2765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Song Plus Design uses Front Drive.