Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs Volkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

8.3

/

Engine / Motor

210

190

4

4

Dimensions

7 Seater

7 Seater

5075

5036

1969

1988

1716

1770

2930

2979

407

583

Fuel Economy

11.9

14.3

74

70

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.7 L

2.0 L - 3.6 L

226 BHP - 273 BHP

235 BHP - 276 BHP

Automatic

8-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

7 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

226 BHP

235 BHP

420

258

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Volkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickVolkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Volkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)

VS

Hongqi | HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)

VS

Hongqi | HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)

VS

Peugeot | ALL-NEW 5008 GT

Mazda | Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2021 3.8L GDi (AWD) Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while Volkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, Volkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while Volkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2979. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Volkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Volkswagen Teramont 2021 2.0L Trendline (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.