Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) vs GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5075
4980 mm
1969
1950 mm
1716
1780 mm
2930
2920 mm
Fuel Economy
74
66 L
/
13.3 Km/L
/
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.7 L
2 L - 2 L
226 BHP - 273 BHP
187 BHP - 332 BHP
Automatic
8-Speed Automatic & 8AT & AISIN 8AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
226 BHP
248 BHP
420
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD)
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2930, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2920 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T High Plus (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.