Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
190
6
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
5100
5009
1994
1979
1756
1750
3010
3099
566
572
Fuel Economy
9.1
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
E-SHIFT (SBW)
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.3 L - 3.3 L
/
340 HP - 345 BHP
215 - 380
8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE & Automatic
Automatic & Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
6 - 8
6 - 7
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
SINGLE
Gasoline
Electric
345 BHP
215 BHP
500
350
/
SINGLE
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus if you care more about power; choose EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a fuel consumption of 10.99, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a wheelbase of 3099. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus uses All Wheel Drive, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) uses Rear Wheel Drive.