Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs Changan CS75 2021 1.8T GDI Basic (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
8.3
/
✓
/
Engine / Motor
190
180
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
/
4.275
4650
1.765
1850
1.535
1705
2.570
2700
240
590
Fuel Economy
15.4
11.4
48
58
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2000 L
/
110 BHP - 148 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.8 L
Petrol
Gasoline
148 BHP
177 BHP
192
245
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Changan CS75 2021 1.8T GDI Basic (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChangan CS75 2021 1.8T GDI Basic (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Changan CS75 2021 1.8T GDI Basic (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Changan CS75 2021 1.8T GDI Basic (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77. Therefore, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570, while Changan CS75 2021 1.8T GDI Basic (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan CS75 2021 1.8T GDI Basic (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Changan CS75 2021 1.8T GDI Basic (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.