Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) vs Territory Titanium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200 km/h
4
4
/
1798 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
/
4.275
4630 mm
1.765
1935 mm
1.535
1706 mm
2.570
2726 mm
240
385 L
/
5 Doors
/
190 mm
Fuel Economy
15.4
15.9
48
60 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
All Liquid Cluster
/
✓
/
Leather Trim
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
8
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.8 L
145 BHP - 148 BHP
190 BHP
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.8 L
Petrol
Gasoline
148 BHP
190 BHP
192
320
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Territory Titanium
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Collision Detection
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Cohesive and stylish exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Balanced engine and steering performance
Negative
- Improve the quality of interior materials and assembly
- Modernization of technological and entertainment systems
- Improved suspension characteristics to reduce vibration
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Territory Titanium if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Territory Titanium has a fuel consumption of 6.29. Therefore, Territory Titanium is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570, while Territory Titanium has a wheelbase of 2726 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Territory Titanium, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Territory Titanium uses Front Drive.