Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD vs Groove 1.5L LT Comparison
Car Information
✓
/
/
SUVEngine / Motor
192
170 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4.395
4500 mm
1.795
/
1.562
/
2.655
/
430
/
/
16
Fuel Economy
15.6
16.1 Km/L
48
45
/
16.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
2
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
4
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
155 BHP - 189 BHP
110 BHP - 110 BHP
Automatic
CVT & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 T
Petrol
Gasoline
155 BHP
145hp
200
255Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Groove 1.5L LT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Pedestrian airbag
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGroove 1.5L LT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD if you care more about power; choose Groove 1.5L LT if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD has a fuel consumption of 6.41, while Groove 1.5L LT has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, Groove 1.5L LT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD has a wheelbase of 2.655, while Groove 1.5L LT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX30 2024 2.0L Urban AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Groove 1.5L LT uses Front Wheel Drive.