Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic vs X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
185km/h
4
4
/
1598 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4.550
4724
1.840
1900
1.675
1720
2.700
2720
506
480 L
/
20"
/
5 Doors
/
210 mm
Fuel Economy
14.7
13 Km/L
58
57 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
4 Way
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
7DCT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Multi Link
/
EPS
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated
/
Disc
Key Spec
1.9 L - 2.5 L
1.6 L - 1.6 L
151 BHP - 188 BHP
197 - 197
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
7DCT & Automatic & DCT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.6T
Petrol
Gasoline
188 BHP
197
251
290
/
In-Line
/
Turbocharge
/
4
/
5500
/
4000
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and attractive exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Excellent financial value for money for features
Negative
- The quality of internal manufacturing needs to be improved
- The suspension system needs better tuning
- Noise control is poor on highways
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic if you care more about fuel economy; choose X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic has a wheelbase of 2.700, while X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX5 2024 2.5L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive, while X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.