Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum Comparison

Car Information

6.2

6.0

Engine / Motor

210

190

6

6

Dimensions

7 Seater

8 Seater

5.100

5.636

1.994

2.029

1.756

1.941

3.010

3.343

566

592

/

Fuel Economy

9.1

8.1

/

107

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

/

/

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

3.3 L

3.5 L - 3496 L

345 BHP

300 BHP - 440

Automatic

10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

7 Seater - 8

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.3 L

3.5 L

Petrol

Petrol

345 BHP

400 BHP

500

650

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Rollover stability control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Excellent towing ability
  • Comfort and ride quality

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is high
  • Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
  • The initial purchase price is high

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFord Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a fuel consumption of 10.99, while Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum has a fuel consumption of 12.35. Therefore, Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a wheelbase of 3.010, while Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum has a wheelbase of 3.343. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda CX90 2024 3.3L High Plus uses All Wheel Drive, while Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum uses All Wheel Drive.