Mazda3 Hatchback Intense vs Figo 1.5L Trend H/B Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
175 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
215/45/R18
/
4460
3796 mm
1795
1686 mm
1435
1527 mm
2725
2489 mm
/
261 L
Fuel Economy
16.8
16.9 Km/L
51
42 L
/
16.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
12
/
Bose
/
Transmission
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
SKYACTIV-G 4 CYLINDER
/
153 HP
110 BHP
153 HP @ 6000 RPM
/
200
136 Nm
200 NM @ 4000 RPM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
1.4 L - 1.6 L
/
84 BHP - 110 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mazda3 Hatchback Intense
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Figo 1.5L Trend H/B
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickFigo 1.5L Trend H/B
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mazda3 Hatchback Intense if you care more about interior space; choose Figo 1.5L Trend H/B if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mazda3 Hatchback Intense has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while Figo 1.5L Trend H/B has a fuel consumption of 5.92. Therefore, Figo 1.5L Trend H/B is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mazda3 Hatchback Intense has a wheelbase of 2725, while Figo 1.5L Trend H/B has a wheelbase of 2489 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda3 Hatchback Intense, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mazda3 Hatchback Intense uses No data, while Figo 1.5L Trend H/B uses Front Wheel Drive.