MC20 Cielo 3.0T V6 vs AMG GT 63 4MATIC Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

325 km/h

315 km/h

6

8

2992 cc

3982 cc

GCC

GCC

Dimensions

2 Seater

2 Seater

2 Doors

2 Doors

4650 mm

4728 mm

1966 mm

1984 mm

1222 mm

1354 mm

2700 mm

2700 mm

100 L

350 L

105 m

/

Fuel Economy

8 Km/L

4 Km/L

70 L

80 L

8 Km/L

4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

Digital

Digital

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Sports

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.2

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

6

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.0 L

4.0 L - 3982 L

630 BHP

469 BHP - 576 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 Seater

2 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

V

3.0 L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

Twin Turbo

4

4

630 BHP

577 BHP

730 Nm

800 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MC20 Cielo 3.0T V6

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • AMG GT 63 4MATIC

    • Remote key types

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAMG GT 63 4MATIC

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MC20 Cielo 3.0T V6 if you care more about fuel economy; choose AMG GT 63 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MC20 Cielo 3.0T V6 has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 25. Therefore, MC20 Cielo 3.0T V6 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MC20 Cielo 3.0T V6 has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MC20 Cielo 3.0T V6 uses All Wheel Drive, while AMG GT 63 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.