Megane 1.6L PE 2025 vs K8 2.5L GDI Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4632 mm
5015 mm
1814 mm
1875 mm
1443 mm
1455 mm
2711 mm
2895 mm
503 L
510 L
Fuel Economy
15.2 Km/L
12 Km/L
50 L
64 L
15.2 Km/L
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1598 L
2.5 L - 3470 L
110 BHP - 150 BHP
177 - 300 BHP
Auto (CVT) & Automatic
8 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
198 BHP
156 Nm
248 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Megane 1.6L PE 2025
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
K8 2.5L GDI
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickK8 2.5L GDI
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Megane 1.6L PE 2025 if you care more about fuel economy; choose K8 2.5L GDI if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Megane 1.6L PE 2025 has a fuel consumption of 6.58, while K8 2.5L GDI has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Megane 1.6L PE 2025 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Megane 1.6L PE 2025 has a wheelbase of 2711 mm, while K8 2.5L GDI has a wheelbase of 2895 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, K8 2.5L GDI, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Megane 1.6L PE 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive, while K8 2.5L GDI uses Front Wheel Drive.