Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC vs F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) Comparison
Car Information
4.8
/
Engine / Motor
250
217 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,749
4746 mm
1,920
2070 mm
1,635
1664 mm
2,873
2874 mm
/
650 L
Fuel Economy
10
13.5 Km/L
66
63 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Burmester®
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0 L turbo-inline-4 with EQ Boost mild-hybrid
/
✓
/
416
246 BHP
312
/
500
365 Nm
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 1997 L
/
246 BHP - 550 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickF Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC if you care more about power; choose F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 10, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,873 , while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a wheelbase of 2874 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLC 43 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) uses All Wheel Drive.