Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
275
250 km/h
/
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2,310
/
4,716
4924 mm
1,890
1948 mm
1,648
1796 mm
2,888
2995 mm
/
4 Doors
/
655 L
/
198 m
Fuel Economy
13.3
11
65
85 L
/
9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
Burmester®
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
9-speed automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0L
3.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged inline-4 + rear electric motor
/
✓
Single Turbo
671
429 BHP
500
320
1,020
560 Nm
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE
Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a fuel consumption of 7.52, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a wheelbase of 2,888, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2995 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E PERFORMANCE uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.