Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
161 km/h
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4924 mm
4341 mm
1948 mm
1804 mm
1796 mm
1693 mm
2995 mm
2676 mm
655 L
414 L
198 m
/
Fuel Economy
11
17.2 Km/L
85 L
50 L
9 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
429 BHP
115 BHP
320
/
560 Nm
156 Nm
Key Spec
/
1.6 L - 1998 L
/
105 BHP - 135 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2995 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.