Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door vs RS e-tron GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
315
/
Dimensions
4
5
5,024
/
1,953
/
1,455
/
2,951
/
Fuel Economy
8.5
/
66
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
4.0 L - 4.0 L
/
429 HP - 831 hp
925 BHP
9-speed automatic & AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed & Automatic & SPEEDSHIFT® TCT 9-speed
DHT
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
2 Seater - 4
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
V
/
4.0L
/
Gasoline
Electric
Turbocharge
/
Twin-turbo
/
639hp
925 BHP
470
/
900
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door
RS e-tron GT
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door if you care more about price; choose RS e-tron GT if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while RS e-tron GT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door has a wheelbase of 2,951, while RS e-tron GT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes‑AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC+ 4‑Door uses Four-Wheel Drive, while RS e-tron GT uses No data.