Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs S e-tron GT Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
4
5
2390
/
5054.6
/
2070.1
/
1447.8
/
2951.48
/
Fuel Economy
12.3
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
265/40R20
/
295/35R20
/
Key Spec
4.0 L
/
462 BHP - 585 BHP
680 BHP
Automatic
DHT
Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
2 Seater
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
V
/
4.0L
/
Hybrid
Electric
Turbocharge
/
Handcrafted AMG 4.0L V8 biturbo w/rear 150kW permanently synchronous electric motor
/
biturbo
/
831 hp
680 BHP
/
/
831 hp @ 5,500-6,500 rpm
/
1400
/
1400 Nm@ 2,500-4,500 rpm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE
- Intelligent Emergency Call
S e-tron GT
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickS e-tron GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE if you care more about overall equipment; choose S e-tron GT if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while S e-tron GT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a wheelbase of 2951.48, while S e-tron GT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE uses Four-Wheel Drive, while S e-tron GT uses No data.