Mercedes-AMG SL 43 vs Granturismo 4.7L V8 MC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
275
301 km/h
Dimensions
4
4 Seater
4,705
4881 mm
1,915
2056 mm
1,359
1353 mm
/
2942 mm
/
260 L
Fuel Economy
/
6.5 Km/L
70
86 L
/
6.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
5.5 L
4.2 L - 4.7 L
537 BHP - 585 BHP
405 BHP - 460 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0L
4.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
421 hp
460 BHP
310
/
500
520 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG SL 43
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Granturismo 4.7L V8 MC
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGranturismo 4.7L V8 MC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG SL 43 if you care more about power; choose Granturismo 4.7L V8 MC if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG SL 43 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Granturismo 4.7L V8 MC has a fuel consumption of 15.38. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG SL 43 has a wheelbase of No data, while Granturismo 4.7L V8 MC has a wheelbase of 2942 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG SL 43 uses Rear Drive, while Granturismo 4.7L V8 MC uses Rear Wheel Drive.