Mercedes-AMG SL 55 4MATIC+ vs Continental GT 4.0T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
295
318 km/h
Dimensions
4
4 Seater
4,705
4850 mm
1,915
1966 mm
1,359
1405 mm
2,700
2851 mm
/
358 L
Fuel Economy
7.5
9.4 Km/L
70
90 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9-speed AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
V
/
4.0L
6.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
twin turbo
/
476 hp
542 BHP
350
/
700
770 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Key Spec
/
6.0 L
/
500 BHP - 626 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
4 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG SL 55 4MATIC+
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Continental GT 4.0T V8
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickContinental GT 4.0T V8
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG SL 55 4MATIC+ if you care more about overall equipment; choose Continental GT 4.0T V8 if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG SL 55 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 13.33, while Continental GT 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Continental GT 4.0T V8 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG SL 55 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2,700, while Continental GT 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 2851 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Continental GT 4.0T V8, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG SL 55 4MATIC+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Continental GT 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive.