MG7 2.0T COM vs Camry 2.5L E (201 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
/
4
4
1990 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1650
/
19
16
4 Doors
/
4884
4920
1889
1840
1447
1445
2778
/
/
/
/
/
Fuel Economy
16.9
17.2
65
60
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
10.25
7
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
6
Driver, Front Passenger, Side And Curtain.
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
8
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
6
6
Transmission
✓
/
9-Speed Automatic
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Mcpherson
/
Multi-link
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
245/40 R19
/
245/40 R19
/
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
185 - 261
176 BHP - 298 BHP
7DCT & 9-Speed Automatic
8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
Single Turbo
/
4
/
261
201 BHP
405 Nm
240
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG7 2.0T COM
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Camry 2.5L E (201 HP)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG7 2.0T COM if you care more about price; choose Camry 2.5L E (201 HP) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG7 2.0T COM has a fuel consumption of 5.92, while Camry 2.5L E (201 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Camry 2.5L E (201 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG7 2.0T COM has a wheelbase of 2778, while Camry 2.5L E (201 HP) has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG7 2.0T COM uses Front Drive, while Camry 2.5L E (201 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.