Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs Tucson Comfort 1.6L Comparison

Car Information

11.3

/

Engine / Motor

193

200 km/h

4

4

/

1596 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4355

4500 mm

1810

1865 mm

1625

1650 mm

2670

2680 mm

358

620 L

/

4 Doors

/

210 m

Fuel Economy

12.5

11 Km/L

63

54 L

/

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

10.25

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.6 L - 2.4 L

150 BHP

130 BHP - 181 BHP

Automatic & CVT

7-DCT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

150 BHP

177 BHP

197

264 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Tucson Comfort 1.6L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
  • Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
  • Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies

Negative

  • Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
  • Engine response and noise at high speeds
  • Storage space is limited as much as

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about price; choose Tucson Comfort 1.6L if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2018 2.0L PE (4x2)

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

BAIC | BAIC X35 2023 1.5L Elite

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8, while Tucson Comfort 1.6L has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670, while Tucson Comfort 1.6L has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tucson Comfort 1.6L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi ASX 2024 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tucson Comfort 1.6L uses Front Wheel Drive.