Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD) vs RAM 1500 2021 3.6L Classic ST (Crew Cab) "4x4" Comparison

Car Information

11.0

/

Engine / Motor

169

175

4

6

Dimensions

6 Seater

3 Seater

5300

5817

1815

2018

1780

1968

3000

3569

/

1500

Fuel Economy

10.0

10.4

75

87

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.4 L - 2.5 L

3.6 L - 5.7 L

128 BHP - 148 BHP

305 BHP - 395 BHP

Manual

Automatic

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

3 Seater - 6 Seater

2 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4 L

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

128 BHP

305 BHP

202

364

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD)

    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • RAM 1500 2021 3.6L Classic ST (Crew Cab) "4x4"

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD) if you care more about price; choose RAM 1500 2021 3.6L Classic ST (Crew Cab) "4x4" if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD)

VS

Great Wall | Poer High 2025

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD)

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2021 3.6L Classic ST (Crew Cab) "4x4"

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD)

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2022 3.6L Classic ST (Crew Cab) "4x4"

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD)

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2021 3.6L Classic ST (Regular Cab) "4x4"

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD)

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2022 3.6L Classic ST (Regular Cab) "4x4"

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 10, while RAM 1500 2021 3.6L Classic ST (Crew Cab) "4x4" has a fuel consumption of 9.62. Therefore, RAM 1500 2021 3.6L Classic ST (Crew Cab) "4x4" is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3000, while RAM 1500 2021 3.6L Classic ST (Crew Cab) "4x4" has a wheelbase of 3569. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RAM 1500 2021 3.6L Classic ST (Crew Cab) "4x4", offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while RAM 1500 2021 3.6L Classic ST (Crew Cab) "4x4" uses All Wheel Drive.