Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL M/T (4WD) (Petrol) vs Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison
Car Information
14.5
10.6
✓
✓
Engine / Motor
167
175
4
5
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5.300
5.362
1.785
1.976
1.775
1.816
3.000
3.221
/
1180
Fuel Economy
11.8
11.1
75
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2.5 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
128 BHP - 148 BHP
118 BHP - 392 BHP
Manual
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 6 Seater
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
3.2 L
Petrol
Diesel
128 BHP
200 BHP
202
470
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL M/T (4WD) (Petrol)
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL M/T (4WD) (Petrol) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL M/T (4WD) (Petrol) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL M/T (4WD) (Petrol) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL M/T (4WD) (Petrol) has a wheelbase of 3.000, while Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL M/T (4WD) (Petrol) uses All Wheel Drive, while Ford Ranger 2024 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive.