MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
4850 mm
4810
1870 mm
1925
1875 mm
1742
2855 mm
2800
235 L
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
80 L
/
/
13
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
6
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
2.0
136 BHP - 190 BHP
254
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Diesel & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
7
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
2.0L
Diesel
Gasoline
190 BHP
254
450 Nm
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MU X 3.0T AWD LS
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 9 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T AWD LS, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.