MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs VX Luxury 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

180 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7 Seater

7 Seater

4850 mm

4970 mm

1870 mm

1940 mm

1875 mm

1788 mm

2855 mm

2900 mm

235 L

461 L

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

80 L

65 L

/

14 Km/L

/

14 Km/L

Comfort

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Smart Entry

/

✓

Interior

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

3-Zone

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Electric

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Standard

Safety

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Android LCD

/

✓

/

8

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.0 L

2.0 L

136 BHP - 190 BHP

261 BHP

Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Diesel & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

7 Seater

Exterior

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Engine

3.0 L

2.0 L

Diesel

Gasoline

190 BHP

261 BHP

450 Nm

400 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MU X 3.0T AWD LS

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
  • VX Luxury 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickVX Luxury 2.0T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about overall equipment; choose VX Luxury 2.0T if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while VX Luxury 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 7.14. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while VX Luxury 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, VX Luxury 2.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while VX Luxury 2.0T uses All Wheel Drive.