MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) vs H2 1.5T Intelligent Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4850 mm
4335 mm
1870 mm
1814 mm
1875 mm
1695 mm
2855 mm
2560 mm
235 L
500 L
Fuel Economy
80 L
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.5 L
Diesel
Gasoline
190 BHP
148 BHP
450 Nm
210 Nm
Key Spec
/
1.5 L
/
147 BHP - 150 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
H2 1.5T Intelligent
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH2 1.5T Intelligent
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) if you care more about interior space; choose H2 1.5T Intelligent if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) has a fuel consumption of No data, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while H2 1.5T Intelligent has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while H2 1.5T Intelligent uses Front Wheel Drive.