Mustang Mach-E GT vs Expedition Active 4X2 2025 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190
/
6
Dimensions
5
8
20
/
4712
5636
1881
2029
1597
1941
2984
3343
100+402
592
Fuel Economy
/
10.3
/
107
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
8
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
370
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Driver and Front-Passenger Dual-Stage, Driver Knee, Front-Seat Side-Impact, Rear-Seat Side-Impact, Side Curtain
Dual Stage front airbags, frontseat side impact airbags,Safety Canopy (includes thirdrow)
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.5
12
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10
6
B&O
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
Approx. 37 mins
/
150 kW
/
Approx. 14.0 hrs
/
10.5 kW
/
Transmission
AT
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
265/70 R18
/
265/70 R18
Key Spec
TBD
/
255 BHP - 487
300 BHP - 440
AT & DHT
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
6 Seater - 8
/
3.5 L - 5.4 L
/
TBD
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
3.5
Electric
Gasoline
487
400
950
650
Motor
✓
/
2
/
Nickel Cobalt Manganese (NCM)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Whisper, Active, Untame, Untame Plus
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mustang Mach-E GT
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Expedition Active 4X2 2025
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mustang Mach-E GT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Expedition Active 4X2 2025 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mustang Mach-E GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Expedition Active 4X2 2025 has a fuel consumption of 9.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mustang Mach-E GT has a wheelbase of 2984, while Expedition Active 4X2 2025 has a wheelbase of 3343. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition Active 4X2 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mustang Mach-E GT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Expedition Active 4X2 2025 uses Rear Drive.