Mustang Mach-E GT vs Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
240 km/h
/
6
/
3500 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
8 Seater
20
/
4712
5334 mm
1881
2006 mm
1597
1930 mm
2984
3111 mm
100+402
530 L
/
5 Doors
/
250 m
Fuel Economy
/
11 Km/L
/
88 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
370
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
Driver and Front-Passenger Dual-Stage, Driver Knee, Front-Seat Side-Impact, Rear-Seat Side-Impact, Side Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.5
12
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
10
8
B&O
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Battery/Charging
Approx. 37 mins
/
150 kW
/
Approx. 14.0 hrs
/
10.5 kW
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
255 BHP - 487
300 BHP - 440
AT & DHT
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
6 Seater - 8
/
3.5 L - 5.4 L
/
TBD
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
3.5 L
Electric
Gasoline
487
380 BHP
950
637 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
✓
/
2
/
Nickel Cobalt Manganese (NCM)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Whisper, Active, Untame, Untame Plus
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mustang Mach-E GT
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mustang Mach-E GT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mustang Mach-E GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mustang Mach-E GT has a wheelbase of 2984, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a wheelbase of 3111 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mustang Mach-E GT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive.