N9 PHEV vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5,258
4341 mm
2,030
1804 mm
1,830
1693 mm
3,125
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic (E-CVT)
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
207 - 925
115 BHP
325 - 1,035
156 Nm
Motor
1,035
/
Key Spec
/
1.3 L - 2.0 L
/
105 BHP - 153 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Manual
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
N9 PHEV
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose N9 PHEV if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, N9 PHEV has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, N9 PHEV has a wheelbase of 3,125, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, N9 PHEV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. N9 PHEV uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.