Nissan Ariya 2024 65 kWh Short-Range (2WD) vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160
/
N/A, Electric
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4595
/
1850
/
1655
/
2775
/
466
514
/
64
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
14.5
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
/
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
217 BHP - 306 BHP
TBD
TBD
DHT
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
0.0 L
/
Electric
Electric
217 BHP
/
300
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
Lithium-ion
/
489
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan Ariya 2024 65 kWh Short-Range (2WD)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan Ariya 2024 65 kWh Short-Range (2WD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Ariya 2024 65 kWh Short-Range (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan Ariya 2024 65 kWh Short-Range (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2775, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Ariya 2024 65 kWh Short-Range (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.