Nissan Juke 2017 Nissan Juke 2017 1.6L S vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison
Car Information
11.5
8.0
✓
✓
Engine / Motor
170
185
4
3
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
✓
/
4.135
4.314
1.765
1.809
1.570
1.624
2.530
2.585
251
448
Fuel Economy
15.9
17.2
52
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.6 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
115 BHP - 190 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic & Manual
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.3 L
Petrol
Petrol
117 BHP
160 BHP
158
230
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan Juke 2017 Nissan Juke 2017 1.6L S
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickNissan Juke 2017 Nissan Juke 2017 1.6L S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan Juke 2017 Nissan Juke 2017 1.6L S if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Juke 2017 Nissan Juke 2017 1.6L S has a fuel consumption of 6.29, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan Juke 2017 Nissan Juke 2017 1.6L S has a wheelbase of 2.530, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Juke 2017 Nissan Juke 2017 1.6L S uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST uses Front Wheel Drive.