Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) vs Peugeot 408 2017 2.0L Access Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

195

6

4

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

5046

4688

1975

1815

1795

1525

2900

2710

470

562

Fuel Economy

9.4

11.6

74

60

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

3.5 L

1.6 L - 2.0 L

254 BHP - 271 BHP

143 BHP - 215

9AT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

145 BHP

271 @ 6,400

/

340

200

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Reflectors
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Peugeot 408 2017 2.0L Access

    • Rear Defogger
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPeugeot 408 2017 2.0L Access

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) if you care more about interior space; choose Peugeot 408 2017 2.0L Access if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS7 2023 3.0T Luxury (AWD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Suburban 2019 5.3L LT 2WD

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS7 2022 3.0T Luxury (AWD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Ford | Ford Expedition 2023 3.5T EcoBoost XLT - Leather (4X2)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Tahoe 2022 5.3L LS 4WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Peugeot 408 2017 2.0L Access has a fuel consumption of 8.62. Therefore, Peugeot 408 2017 2.0L Access is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) has a wheelbase of 2900, while Peugeot 408 2017 2.0L Access has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while Peugeot 408 2017 2.0L Access uses Front Wheel Drive.