Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD vs Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost XL Comparison

Car Information

8.0

7.5

/

Engine / Motor

190

185

6

6

Dimensions

8

8 Seater

5046

5.233

1975

2.024

1795

1.960

2900

3.022

470

528

/

Fuel Economy

9.4

9.1

74

106

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

3.5 L - 5.4 L

250 BHP - 271 BHP

300 BHP - 440

9AT & Automatic & CVT

10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 8 Seater

6 Seater - 8

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Petrol

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

385 BHP

271 @ 6,400

/

340

629

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

N/A

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost XL

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Rollover stability control
    • Speed Limiter
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Excellent towing ability
  • Comfort and ride quality

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is high
  • Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
  • The initial purchase price is high

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFord Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost XL

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost XL if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.8L GDi (AWD) Premium (7 Seats)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

VS

Tesla | Model Y Rear-Wheel Drive

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2023 Standard Range

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2024 Standard Range

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost XL has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost XL has a wheelbase of 3.022. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost XL uses All Wheel Drive.