Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
6
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5046
4950 mm
1975
1930 mm
1795
1730 mm
2900
2850 mm
470
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
9.4
20 Km/L
74
65 L
/
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
250 BHP - 271 BHP
240 BHP - 240 BHP
9AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Hybrid & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
240 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
237 Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.