OCTA vs Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

206 km/h

/

4

/

1984 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

5,018

4485 mm

2,105

1856 mm

1,995

1585 mm

3,023

2680 mm

/

5 Doors

/

530 L

/

170 m

Fuel Economy

7.6Km/L

11 Km/L

/

60 L

/

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

8-speed ZF automatic transmission

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5 L

1.4 L - 2.0 L

300 BHP - 635

150 BHP - 180 BHP

8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic

TBD

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 8 Seater

5 Seater

Engine

4.4L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

635

180 BHP

750 Nm

320 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • OCTA

    • Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • Rear Defogger
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickQ3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose OCTA if you care more about interior space; choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | OCTA

    VS

    Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 5.0L V8 SVR (575 PS)

    Land Rover | OCTA

    VS

    BMW | BMW X7 2022 xDriveM50i

    Land Rover | OCTA

    VS

    BMW | BMW X7 2021 xDriveM50i

    Land Rover | OCTA

    VS

    Porsche | Cayenne Turbo E-Hybrid

    Land Rover | OCTA

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Cayenne 2024 Turbo S E-Hybrid

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, OCTA has a fuel consumption of 13.16, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, OCTA has a wheelbase of 3,023, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, OCTA, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. OCTA uses No data, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.