Okavango GF 2026 vs Mokka 1.2T Ultimate Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
19"
/
4860
4151 mm
1910
1791 mm
1770
1531 mm
2825
2557 mm
/
options.1,372 L
Fuel Economy
/
16.9 Km/L
/
44 L
/
16.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
3.510.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
PVC Leather
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
6
/
Transmission
7DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Electric
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
/
190 BHP - 218
/
7DCT & Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
7 - 7
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
218
130 BHP
325
230 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Okavango GF 2026
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Speed Alert
Mokka 1.2T Ultimate
- 360 Degree camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMokka 1.2T Ultimate
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Okavango GF 2026 if you care more about interior space; choose Mokka 1.2T Ultimate if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Okavango GF 2026 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate has a fuel consumption of 5.92. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Okavango GF 2026 has a wheelbase of 2825, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate has a wheelbase of 2557 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Okavango GF 2026, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Okavango GF 2026 uses No data, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate uses Front Wheel Drive.