Optima 2.4L GDI vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
205 km/h
185 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4855 mm
4440 mm
1860 mm
1833 mm
1465 mm
1560 mm
2805 mm
2700 mm
450 L
330 L
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
70 L
60 L
12 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L
1.8 L
194 BHP
130 BHP
AT
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
185 BHP
130 BHP
241 Nm
170 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Optima 2.4L GDI
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Optima 2.4L GDI if you care more about interior space; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Optima 2.4L GDI has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, GS Sport 1.8L Classic is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Optima 2.4L GDI has a wheelbase of 2805 mm, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Optima 2.4L GDI, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Optima 2.4L GDI uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.