OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
235 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4820 mm
4341 mm
1840 mm
1804 mm
1605 mm
1693 mm
2745 mm
2676 mm
options.1,801 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
10.1 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
60 L
50 L
10.1 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2500 L
1.6 L - 1998 L
172 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
CVT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.6 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
257 BHP
115 BHP
350 Nm
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD has a fuel consumption of 9.9, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD has a wheelbase of 2745 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.