Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line vs Captiva LS Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

7 Seater

4709 mm

/

1897 mm

/

1745 mm

/

2705 mm

/

331 L

1051L

/

18

Fuel Economy

14.7 Km/L

/

55 L

/

14.7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

Interior

/

3.5

/

/

diagonal display

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Safety

/

2 Front and sides

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

10.4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

4

Transmission

/

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

Mcpherson

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.4 L - 3.0 L

1.5 L - 3.0 L

165 BHP - 236 BHP

144 BHP - 264 BHP

Automatic & CVT

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 7

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

HALOGEN

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

1.5 T

Gasoline

Gasoline

181 BHP

144 BHP

245 Nm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Manual

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS
  • Captiva LS

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Integrated specifications
  • Competitive price value

Negative

  • Engine performance is moderate
  • Limited driving experience
  • Traditional interior design

Positive

  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Comfortable and spacious interior space
  • Competitive price for specifications

Negative

  • Average engine performance
  • The quality of interior materials need to improve
  • A feature limited entertainment system

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCaptiva LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line if you care more about power; choose Captiva LS if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while Captiva LS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a wheelbase of 2705 mm, while Captiva LS has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line uses Front Wheel Drive, while Captiva LS uses Front Wheel Drive.