Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
/
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5080 mm
4950 mm
1940 mm
1930 mm
1855 mm
1730 mm
2970 mm
2850 mm
668 L
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
5.8 Km/L
20 Km/L
135 L
65 L
5.8 Km/L
20 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.8 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
280 BHP
240 - 240
Automatic & Manual
CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.8 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
280 BHP
240 BHP
451 Nm
237 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top
- ABS
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top if you care more about interior space; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 17.24, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari A/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.