Peugeot 301 2016 Allure vs K8 2.5L GDI Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
188
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4442
5015 mm
1748
1875 mm
1477
1455 mm
2655
2895 mm
640
510 L
Fuel Economy
15.4
12 Km/L
50
64 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1587 L
2.5 L - 3470 L
115 BHP
177 - 300 BHP
Automatic & Manual
8 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
198 BHP
150
248 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Peugeot 301 2016 Allure
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
K8 2.5L GDI
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickK8 2.5L GDI
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Peugeot 301 2016 Allure if you care more about fuel economy; choose K8 2.5L GDI if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Peugeot 301 2016 Allure has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while K8 2.5L GDI has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Peugeot 301 2016 Allure is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Peugeot 301 2016 Allure has a wheelbase of 2655, while K8 2.5L GDI has a wheelbase of 2895 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, K8 2.5L GDI, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Peugeot 301 2016 Allure uses Front Wheel Drive, while K8 2.5L GDI uses Front Wheel Drive.