Pilot EX 3.5L vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison

Car Information

Gasoline

/

/

/

Honda

/

212.5

/

355

/

5089x1994x1801

/

8.7

/

3.5

/

/

598 km

/

800V

Engine / Motor

6

/

3471cc

/

Dimensions

8

5

1534

/

18 英寸

/

5089

/

1994

/

1801

/

2890

/

185

/

/

514

/

64

Fuel Economy

/

/

70

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

11.9

/

Dinamica Microfibre

/

/

Sport Seats Plus

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

14.5

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

9

/

Battery/Charging

/

270

/

11

/

10 min

Transmission

10

/

Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

255/60 R18

/

255/60 R18

/

Key Spec

3.5 L - 3500 L

/

280 BHP - 285

TBD

Automatic

DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

8 - 8

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.5

/

Gasoline

Electric

Naturally Aspirated

/

3.5L V6 Quad Cam

/

4

/

11.5:1

/

DUAL VTC+Quad Cam

/

285

/

212.5

/

6100

/

355

/

5000

/

VCM 可变气缸管理

/

高压直喷

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Lithium-ion

/

489

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pilot EX 3.5L

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Electric Locks
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • SQ6 e-tron

    • 360 Degree Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSQ6 e-tron

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pilot EX 3.5L if you care more about overall equipment; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Honda | Pilot EX 3.5L

VS

Honda | Pilot 2WD EX

Honda | Pilot EX 3.5L

VS

Honda | Pilot EX 3.5L

Honda | Pilot EX 3.5L

VS

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

Honda | Pilot EX 3.5L

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2022 GTS

Honda | Pilot EX 3.5L

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2021 GTS

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pilot EX 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 8.7, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pilot EX 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2890, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pilot EX 3.5L uses Front Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.