Pilot EX-L 3.5L vs Ti 3 RWD Pro Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
3471cc
/
Dimensions
8
5
1534
/
18 英寸
/
5089
4605
1994
1900
1826
1720
2890
/
210
/
Fuel Economy
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
10
/
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
265/60 R18
235/60 R18
265/60 R18
235/60 R18
✓
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
/
253 BHP - 285
218 BHP - 422 BHP
Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 Seater - 8
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
3.5
/
Gasoline
Electric
Naturally Aspirated
/
3.5L V6 Quad Cam
/
4
/
11.5:1
/
DUAL VTC+Quad Cam
/
285
218 BHP
212.5
/
6100
/
355
/
5000
/
VCM 可变气缸管理
/
高压直喷
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pilot EX-L 3.5L
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Ti 3 RWD Pro
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Strong performance and acceptable fuel economy
- Advanced and reliable security features
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- The infotainment system may be complicated
- Limited engine options
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pilot EX-L 3.5L if you care more about power; choose Ti 3 RWD Pro if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pilot EX-L 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 8.7, while Ti 3 RWD Pro has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pilot EX-L 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2890, while Ti 3 RWD Pro has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pilot EX-L 3.5L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Ti 3 RWD Pro uses Rear Drive.