Prado TXR 2.4T vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
2393 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4925 mm
4760 mm
1980 mm
1930 mm
1925 mm
1927 mm
2850 mm
2750 mm
104 L
400 L
221 m
224 m
Fuel Economy
10.6 Km/L
10 Km/L
110 L
75 L
10.6 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Fabric
Leather
Digital
Digital
3-Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2.4 L
2.0 L
201 - 267 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
8 Speed Automatic & 8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.4 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
267 BHP
224 BHP
430 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Prado TXR 2.4T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Prado TXR 2.4T if you care more about fuel economy; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Prado TXR 2.4T has a fuel consumption of 9.43, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Prado TXR 2.4T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Prado TXR 2.4T has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Prado TXR 2.4T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Prado TXR 2.4T uses Four Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.