Qin Plus FWD vs Mazda 6 Entry Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
221
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1500
/
17
17
4
4
4765
4865
1837
1840
1495
1450
2720
/
500
429
Fuel Economy
26
/
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
Cloth
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
6 Airbags (Dual front + Side front + Curtain)
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
8
✓
/
✓
✓
6
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
/
6
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
2.0 L - 2.5 L
177 BHP - 197 BHP
151 BHP - 231 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
190 BHP
325
252
/
91
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
Sport
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Mazda 6 Entry
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about power; choose Mazda 6 Entry if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85, while Mazda 6 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720, while Mazda 6 Entry has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive, while Mazda 6 Entry uses Front Drive.