QX50 Luxe Style AWD vs Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230
207
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4693
4697
1903
1882
1679
1681
2800
2791
895
650
Fuel Economy
11.1
13.5
60
60
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 1997 L
/
268 BHP
/
CVT
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
268 BHP
180 BHP
380
320
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX50 Luxe Style AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSkoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX50 Luxe Style AWD if you care more about interior space; choose Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX50 Luxe Style AWD has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX50 Luxe Style AWD has a wheelbase of 2800, while Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2791. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX50 Luxe Style AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX50 Luxe Style AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Skoda Kodiaq 2023 2.0 TSI Style (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.